601
Also I see these Regulations are said to be ismed under ord: 14 of 1887:
not think I have seen much an Ordinance, of the wording of the section alluded to
may affect the necessity of any reply,
to this despatch
The old Ordinance oo 1869 did not require, as far as the lecy later. apporome of any regulations.
Ivementer
You can probably drift for const on
the lines of this minute.
Jan esty100
1454 lince obtained from Registry; when the Grot wa
Supply Rep.
misticted to issue a
on this point-it ardently, was not intended to istnea wholisel
of Reps only to apply to newcomers
Int. Meade
-X.
Lee !!
a Consolida
Ord. Bus.
These Regus are with the exception of 4 which is new) practically a refrighte of the premise des issued a few gener
altogether. oo that no. I is
age,
A
avang
Isulmit draft accordingly.
Gur-
S.W.9.28 July
Perhaps, the way adsailed that in preceding under
A
the new enactment it was best to reime the whole of the old sides; sections 3 preserves any "sights acquired under
the
the repented Ordinances; but as the you? had the power from time to time to regulati the general conditions upon which pension,
1
were the franted, Japprehend that no
technical sight
regulations
Bliceman would have any
complain
top the at the repeal of any oil reg.
though we thould naturally respect vected
inlivests, if they
were
seriously affecture in
very print which Ido not believe to be the case
W. Johnsais draft habmitted
The new Ordinance does not
Min
appear to require that the Rey should be issued wilt the tecy of teater apporrat; of course we can criticize & it might the best to lay dom draft holes thould
that
any
always be submitted home
first before issue.
Inn
RM 27P
1/5/85.
:
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.